On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 9:58 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
<heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> On 06.12.2010 15:53, Robert Haas wrote:
>>
>> I guess. It still seems far too much like exposing the server's guts
>> for my taste. It might not be as bad as the expression tree stuff,
>> but there's nothing particularly good about it either.
>
> Note that we already have txid_current_snapshot() function, which exposes
> all that.
Fair enough, and I think that's actually useful for Slony &c. But I
don't think we should shy away of providing a cleaner API here.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
