Re: Path question - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Path question
Date
Msg-id AANLkTi=K1dNsiext1HHUAaQG9T43fiww1Th4RuRYZ+5p@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Path question  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Path question  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
2010/9/23 Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>:
> All of this leaves me wondering why Greg ended up ifdefing out this
> code in the first place.  There's probably something I'm missing
> here...  but for now I can't think of a better idea than just removing
> the #ifdefs and hoping that whatever problem they were causing was
> limited to an earlier version of the code that no longer exists.

...and FAIL.  I missed the blindingly obvious here, which is that
without these tests commented out, while it passes regression tests,
the merge append stuff stops working.  I think for some reason without
this stuff in there the appropriate index paths fail to get generated
for the child rels.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [RRR] Commitfest: The Good, The Bad, and the Ugly
Next
From: Darren Duncan
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposal: plpgsql - "for in array" statement