Re: FPI - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: FPI
Date
Msg-id AANLkTi=Jm=p256etktLcPjNnYEgCHQMoJVZSUhYtK2ii@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: FPI  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: FPI  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 1:42 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>> Say what?  A heap deletion compacts the page --- it will certainly fail
>>> badly on torn-page.
>
>> What do you mean by "compacts the page"?  I would interpret that to
>> mean "reclaims the space formerly used by the tuple being deleted",
>> but it certainly can't do that.
>
> Oh, I'm sorry, I was confusing the case with vacuum cleanup.  Obviously
> hadn't consumed any caffeine yet.  Nevermind ...

OK.  You had me worried for a minute there.  :-)

Any substantive comments, besides the obvious "this is not 9.1 material"?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: patch: fix performance problems with repated decomprimation of varlena values in plpgsql
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: mingw format warnings