On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 8:36 PM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> I agree with you, but if we want it *this* release, on top of all the
> other features we have queued, then I suggest we compromise. If you hold
> out for more feature, you may get less.
>
> Statement timeout = 2 * (100ms + autovacuum_vacuum_cost_delay) *
> tablesize/(autovacuum_vacuum_cost_limit / vacuum_cost_page_dirty)
I'm inclined to think that would be a very dangerous compromise.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
