On Feb 21, 2011 3:29 PM, "Dave Page" <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:
>
> Thanks Nikhil.
>
> Are there any catalog changes with the refactoring, that change the
> way parameters are represented that need to be reflected elsewhere in
> pgFunction.cpp?
>
> Also, does anyone object to back-patching this? It's not a bug fix,
> but it does mean that we don't support corresponding versions of PPAS
> and PG in the same version of pgAdmin which seems undesirable.
I wasn't aware they were supposed to be? Is that new, or has it always been?
More to the point - is this the only thing needed to reach compatibility? If so, i guess we can make an exception. If not, then there is no point without doing a bunch of more patches for other things, in which case i will object...
The
> patch is pretty straightforward and seems low risk.
This is of course a prerequisite in either case? I also assume it affects only an edbas codepath?
/Magnus
