On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 11:39 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> EXPLAIN currently shows ModifyTable nodes as just "Insert", "Update",
> or "Delete", without any indication of the target table. This was
> more or less good enough when there could only be one such node per
> query, but it's looking pretty inadequate to me as I play around
> with data-modifying statements in WITH.
>
> The obvious thing to do is show the target table much as we do for
> table scan nodes, eg "Update on my_table". There is a deficiency
> in that, which is that for inherited UPDATE/DELETE cases a single
> ModifyTable node could have multiple target tables. But after
> reflecting on it a bit, I think it would be good enough to show
> the parent table name. The individual child plans will necessarily
> include scans of the individual child tables, so you can figure
> out which is which from that if you need to know.
>
> Alternatively we could list all the target tables in a new node
> attribute, eg
>
> Update (costs...)
> Target Tables: foo_parent, foo_child1, ...
>
> But in the majority of cases this seems like a waste of precious
> vertical space.
>
> Thoughts?
I think it's good to include the table name, for sure. I *think* I
agree that it isn't necessary to include the child names.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
