Re: disposition of remaining patches - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Daniel Farina
Subject Re: disposition of remaining patches
Date
Msg-id AANLkTi=260oeNvn9QBPV60N8TJ9Bd79aVJWPFPjQz8kx@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: disposition of remaining patches  (marcin mank <marcin.mank@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 5:25 AM, marcin mank <marcin.mank@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Daniel Farina <daniel@heroku.com> wrote:
>>
>> Right now, as it stands, the syncrep patch will be happy as soon as
>> the data has been fsynced to either B or A-prime; I don't think we can
>> guarantee at any point that A-prime can become the leader, and feed B.
>>
>
> - start A` up, replicating from A
> - shutdown B (now A nad A` are synchronous)
> now real quick:
> - shut down A
> - shut down A`
> -change configuration
> -start up A`
> -start up B
>
> Doesn`t this work?

This dance does work, but it would be very nice to not have to take
the standby ('B' in my case) offline.

-- 
fdr


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: wCTE: why not finish sub-updates at the end, not the beginning?
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP: cross column correlation ...