Re: Regression tests fail with musl libc because libpq.so can't be loaded - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Christophe Pettus
Subject Re: Regression tests fail with musl libc because libpq.so can't be loaded
Date
Msg-id A9F65857-A286-4EB8-96CE-EA5C1636A05C@thebuild.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Regression tests fail with musl libc because libpq.so can't be loaded  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: Regression tests fail with musl libc because libpq.so can't be loaded  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-bugs

> On Mar 17, 2024, at 13:33, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
>
> That seems a little shortsighted. If other libc implementations find it appropriate to have similar macros why should
theybe different? 

It's a philosophical argument against checking for particular libc implementations instead of particular features.  I'm
notunsympathetic to that argument, but AFAICT there's no clean way of checking for this by examining feature #defines. 


pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: Regression tests fail with musl libc because libpq.so can't be loaded
Next
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: Regression tests fail with musl libc because libpq.so can't be loaded