On Feb 5, 2007, at 11:19 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Jim Nasby wrote:
>> There was also mention of having a means to tell pg_dump not to
>> dump extensions...
> What's the use case for that? What will we do if there are db
> objects that depend on some extensions? Given that there will be
> some uninstall support, this one seems less necessary.
In addition to Martijn's tsearch case, there's also PostGIS. And I
believe this is a pretty big pain for them.
> I really think we should approach this by not trying to do
> everything at once.
That's fine; I just wanted to point out the use case while lists were
being made.
--
Jim Nasby jim@nasby.net
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell)
