On 9/4/21, 10:26 AM, "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:
> Attached are the same patches as last night, except I added a test for
> XLOG_DEBUG where pertinent. (The elog(PANIC) is not made conditional on
> that, since it's a cross-check rather than informative.) Also fixed the
> silly pg_rewind mistake I made.
>
> I'll work on the new xlog record early next week.
Are these patches in a good state for some preliminary testing? I'd
like to try them out, but I'll hold off if they're not quite ready
yet.
Nathan
