Thanks, that is much better.
On 31 Mar 2004, at 19:14, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 31, 2004 at 05:41:03PM -0500, Randall Skelton wrote:
>> Can someone please explain how I can make this sub-query faster? In
>> the case below, 'test' is a temporary table but I have tried with test
>> being a full, indexed, and 'vacuum analysed' table and it still takes
>> more than 130 seconds. Note that 'test' has very few rows but
>> 'cal_quat_1' has many rows.
>
> Have you tried just using a join? Like:
>
> explain analyze select value from cal_quat_1, test where timestamp = t
> order by t;
>
> Also, an index on cal_quat_1.timestamp might be good too...
