Re: pg_listening_channels() - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Igor Neyman
Subject Re: pg_listening_channels()
Date
Msg-id A76B25F2823E954C9E45E32FA49D70EC08F04565@mail.corp.perceptron.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_listening_channels()  ("Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg@turnstep.com>)
Responses Re: pg_listening_channels()  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: pg_listening_channels()  ("Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg@turnstep.com>)
List pgsql-general
________________________________________
From: Greg Sabino Mullane [greg@turnstep.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 10:26 AM
To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: pg_listening_channels()

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160


Igor Neyman asked:

[Postgres 9.2]
> How (if it's even possible) can I get listening channels
> for all sessions/ connections in the database?

No, this is not possible. You can only see items
from your own session.

- --

IMHO, that's a step back comparing to "older" implementation of LISTEN/NOTIFY.

Of course allowing "payload" to be attached to NOTIFY signal (instead of being passed through some user defined table)
isa good thing. 
But, I (and probably many others) use LISTEN/NOTIFY mechanism to notify client program connected to postgres database
aboutchanges made in the database 
Implementation prior to PG 9.0:

INTERESTED_CLIENT: LISTEN my_alert;
SOME_OTHER_PROGRAM: INSERTS/UPDATES/DELETES table_client_interested_in;
ON INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE TRIGGER: check if anyone listens on "my_alert" channel by querying pg_listener table, sends
NOTIFYmy_alert signal and inserts message into user_message_table; 
INTERESTED_CLIENT: upon receiving NOTIFY signal reads message from  user_message_table;

With PG 9.0 changes I lost ability to check if anyone is interested in the NOTIFY signal and payload I'm about to send.
Seems like this change was not thought through completely.

Regards,
Igor Neyman


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: hartrc
Date:
Subject: pgagent linux install issues
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: 'alternatives'