Re: How the Planner in PGStrom differs from PostgreSQL? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Albe Laurenz
Subject Re: How the Planner in PGStrom differs from PostgreSQL?
Date
Msg-id A737B7A37273E048B164557ADEF4A58B5397D510@ntex2010i.host.magwien.gv.at
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: How the Planner in PGStrom differs from PostgreSQL?  (Mark Anns <aishwaryaanns@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: How the Planner in PGStrom differs from PostgreSQL?  (Mark Anns <aishwaryaanns@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
Mark Anns wrote:
> How the planning factors of PGStrom differs from planning factos of
> PostgreSQL?

I don't know what exactly you mean by a "planning factor".

What PGStrom does is estimate the cost of the GPU operations
and attach these costs to a custom scan node which is part of
a query plan.

Many different plans are generated; some will involve PGStrom,
some will not.  The optimizer then chooses among these plans the
one with the lowest total cost.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Karsten Hilbert
Date:
Subject: Re: Fwd: Creating multiple instances of postresql on Windows environment
Next
From: Mark Anns
Date:
Subject: Re: How the Planner in PGStrom differs from PostgreSQL?