Re: Add PGDLLEXPORT to PG_FUNCTION_INFO_V1 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Albe Laurenz
Subject Re: Add PGDLLEXPORT to PG_FUNCTION_INFO_V1
Date
Msg-id A737B7A37273E048B164557ADEF4A58B5396277C@ntex2010a.host.magwien.gv.at
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Add PGDLLEXPORT to PG_FUNCTION_INFO_V1  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Add PGDLLEXPORT to PG_FUNCTION_INFO_V1
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> I poked at this a little bit.  AFAICT, the only actual cross-file
> references are in contrib/ltree/, which has quite a few.  Maybe we
> could hold our noses and attach PGDLLEXPORT to the declarations in
> ltree.h.
> 
> hstore's HSTORE_POLLUTE macro would also need PGDLLEXPORT-ification,
> but that's just within the macro so it wouldn't be too ugly.
> 
> The other problem is xml2's xml_is_well_formed(), which duplicates
> the name of a core backend function.  If we PGDLLEXPORT-ify that,
> we get conflicts against the core's declaration in utils/xml.h.
> I do not see any nice way to dodge that.  Maybe we could decide that
> six releases' worth of backwards compatibility is enough and
> just drop it from xml2 --- AFAICS, that would only break applications
> that had never updated to the extension-ified version of xml2 at all.

I guess it would also be possible, but undesirable, to decorate the
declaration in utils/xml.h.

Anyway, I have prepared a patch along the lines you suggest.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Petr Jelinek
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Logical decoding timeline following take II
Next
From: Pavan Deolasee
Date:
Subject: Re: FSM corruption leading to errors