Tom Lane wrote:
> Albe Laurenz <laurenz.albe@wien.gv.at> writes:
>> I just noticed that the documentation for CREATE FUNCTION still mentions
>> that the temporary namespace is searched for functions even though that
>> has been removed with commit aa27977.
>
> The example you propose to correct was introduced by that same commit,
> which should make you think twice about whether it really was invalidated
> by that commit.
Yes, I wondered about that.
> I believe the reason for forcing pg_temp to the back of the path is to
> prevent unqualified table names from being captured by pg_temp entries.
> This risk exists despite the rule against searching pg_temp for functions
> or operators. A maliciously named temp table could at least prevent
> a security definer function from doing what it was supposed to, and
> could probably hijack control entirely via triggers or rules.
>
> Possibly the documentation should be more explicit about why this is
> being done, but the example code is good as-is.
Maybe something like the attached would keep people like me from
misunderstanding this.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
