Jeff Janes wrote:
>> I am curious because of "while xmax is the transaction ID that
>> *removed* the row".
>
> "marked for removal" would be more accurate. If the row were actually
> physically removed, it would no longer have a xmax to set.
Yes, thanks for the clarification.
I was thinking "logically removed", but I realize my wording was confusing.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
