Re: Detecting query timeouts properly - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Albe Laurenz
Subject Re: Detecting query timeouts properly
Date
Msg-id A737B7A37273E048B164557ADEF4A58B17D4CEFF@ntex2010i.host.magwien.gv.at
Whole thread Raw
In response to Detecting query timeouts properly  (Evan Martin <postgresql@realityexists.net>)
List pgsql-general
Evan Martin wrote:
> I'm using PostgreSQL 9.2.8 via Npgsql 2.2.0. When a query times out it
> returns error 57014 with the message "canceling statement due to
> statement timeout". I use the message to detect the timeout and re-try
> in some cases. It seems a bit wrong to rely on the message, though - I
> presume the message text is subject to change between releases. Is there
> a better way? I cannot just rely on code 57014, because the same code is
> used when the user cancels the query (eg. from pgAdmin), in which case I
> don't want to re-try.

I don't think that there is a good way to disambiguate that, and I agree
that parsing the error message text is not a very robust solution.

Is it really necessary to bother with the case that a statement is
explicitly canceled?  That should not happen too often, and if you have
statement_timeout set to non-zero, queries should not "hang" indefinitely
long anyway, right?

Yours
Laurenz Albe

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: smcg2297@frii.com
Date:
Subject: Re: a couple questions about convert()
Next
From: Pete Hollobon
Date:
Subject: Re: Feature request: temporary schemas