Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> Guess guessing, but I bet the collation is what hurts, [...]
> (The background for my guess: on your Linux box UTF-8 is likely the
> normal local encoding, but on Windows that isn't true, and 1252 is
> _almost_ but not quite Unicode. This bites people generally in
> internationalization.)
I beg your pardon, but Windows-1252 has nothing to do with Unicode
or UTF-8. The only connection is that Windows-1252 and UTF-8 both
are ASCII supersets.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
