Darren Duncan wrote:
> Consider the context however. We're talking about a UNIQUE constraint and so
> what we want to do is prevent the existence of multiple tuples in a relation
> that are the same for some defined subset of their attributes. I would argue
> that logically, and commonsensically, two tuples with no attributes are the
> same, and hence a set of distinct tuples having zero attributes could have no
> more than one member, and so a UNIQUE constraint over zero attributes would say
> the relation can't have more than one tuple. So unless someone wants to argue
> that two tuples with no attributes are not the same, my interpretation makes
> more sense and is clearly the one to follow. -- Darren Duncan
What you propose is not an interpretation, but an extension
of the standard. I'm not certain about that "clearly" either;
intuition is a questionable guideline when it comes to the
standard:
SELECT 'Things that feel equal are ' || CASE WHEN NULL = NULL THEN '' ELSE 'not always ' END || 'equal';
?column?
---------------------------------------------Things that feel equal are not always equal
(1 row)
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
