Seems like decompress and compress were offending here, simply
removing them from gist index create helped.
But, I still get on explain analyze that seqscan was used, rather
than gist. Even tho ~ operator is defined for gist, and that seqscan
is set to false.
On 2005-10-28, at 00:24, gj wrote:
>
>
> Breakpoint 1, gistpenalty (giststate=0xbfc254e4, attno=0,
> key1=0xbfc252d4,
> isNull1=0 '\0', key2=0xbfc24fd4, isNull2=0 '\0',
> penalty=0xbfc24fb0) at gistutil.c:821
> 821 FunctionCall3(&giststate->penaltyFn[attno],
> (gdb) p key1
> $1 = (GISTENTRY *) 0xbfc252d4
> (gdb) p key1->key
> $2 = 0
> (gdb) p key2->key
> $3 = 138721324
>
>
> Sorry, key1 and key2 are just GISTENTRY pointers.
> so, as I can see this is NULL indeed, so my _penalty function is ok.
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that
> your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>
