> 10 нояб. 2020 г., в 05:13, Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com> написал(а):
> After the issue reported in [1] got fixed, I've restarted the multi-xact
> stress test, hoping to reproduce the issue. But so far no luck :-(
Tomas, many thanks for looking into this. I figured out that to make multixact sets bigger transactions must hang for a
whileand lock large set of tuples. But not continuous range to avoid locking on buffer_content.
I did not manage to implement this via pgbench, that's why I was trying to hack on separate go program. But,
essentially,no luck either.
I was observing something resemblant though
пятница, 8 мая 2020 г. 15:08:37 (every 1s)
pid | wait_event | wait_event_type | state | query
-------+----------------------------+-----------------+--------+----------------------------------------------------
41344 | ClientRead | Client | idle | insert into t1 select generate_series(1,1000000,1)
41375 | MultiXactOffsetControlLock | LWLock | active | select * from t1 where i = ANY ($1) for share
41377 | MultiXactOffsetControlLock | LWLock | active | select * from t1 where i = ANY ($1) for share
41378 | | | active | select * from t1 where i = ANY ($1) for share
41379 | MultiXactOffsetControlLock | LWLock | active | select * from t1 where i = ANY ($1) for share
41381 | | | active | select * from t1 where i = ANY ($1) for share
41383 | MultiXactOffsetControlLock | LWLock | active | select * from t1 where i = ANY ($1) for share
41385 | MultiXactOffsetControlLock | LWLock | active | select * from t1 where i = ANY ($1) for share
(8 rows)
but this picture was not stable.
How do you collect wait events for aggregation? just insert into some table with cron?
Thanks!
Best regards, Andrey Borodin.
