Correct, I'll take off
-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-general-owner@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-general-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of John R Pierce
Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 2011 2:46 PM
To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] UNABLE TO CONNECT REMOTELY TO port 5436 - CRITICAL
On 12/27/11 11:34 AM, Jacques Lamothe wrote:
> Output
>
> [root@vpdb1 ~]# iptables -L -vn
> Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT 44094 packets, 6327K bytes)
> pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination
> 0 0 ACCEPT tcp -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 tcp dpt:5436
>
> Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT 0 packets, 0 bytes)
> pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination
>
> Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT 43575 packets, 6143K bytes)
> pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination
> [root@vpdb1 ~]#
it appears there's no iptables based firewall configured at all, the
default policy is ACCEPT, so there's really no point in that rule for 5436
--
john r pierce N 37, W 122
santa cruz ca mid-left coast
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
