On 15 Oct 2011, at 11:31, Florian Pflug wrote:
>
> Ok, here's a first cut.
So I looked at the patch, and first thing that pops out,
is lack of the volatile keyword before the ClientConnectionLostPending variable is defined. Is that done on purpose ?
Isthat on purpose ?
Otherwise the patch itself looks ok.
I haven't tested the code, just reviewed the patch itself. And it obviously needs testing, should be easy to follow
youroriginal problem description.
Btw, I just tried to do it through commitfest.postgresql.org , but before I get my head around on how to add myself to
thereviewer list there - I thought I'll just send this response here.
