On Jan 28, 2011, at 9:48 AM, Jeff Davis wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 09:17 -0800, David Fetter wrote:
>> For consistency, and in order not to continue our atrocious naming
>> tradition, I'd like to propose that the above be named timestamprange
>> (tsrange for short) and timestamptzrange (tstzrange for short).
>
> No real objection, but I'd like to see if someone else will second it.
+1 in principal. I think we should try to avoid the user of the term "period" if possible, and I see definite benefits
toa simple model of $typename . 'range';
> Keep in mind that it's fairly easy for people to add their own range
> types. The most difficult part is defining the "canonical" function if
> it is applicable, and the "subtype_float" function which is necessary
> for GiST.
Is there GIN support? GIN seems to be the preferred index type for this sort of thing, no?
Best,
David
