Re: Data corruption issues using streaming replication on 9.0.14/9.2.5/9.3.1 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Christophe Pettus
Subject Re: Data corruption issues using streaming replication on 9.0.14/9.2.5/9.3.1
Date
Msg-id A19BC379-2AA5-4BC6-8482-C20571D963CD@thebuild.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Data corruption issues using streaming replication on 9.0.14/9.2.5/9.3.1  (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Data corruption issues using streaming replication on 9.0.14/9.2.5/9.3.1  (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Nov 19, 2013, at 10:29 AM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:

> It's pretty unlikely that any automated testing would have cought this,
> the required conditions are too unlikely for that.

I would expect that "promote secondary while primary is under heavy load" is clear-cut test case.  What concerns me
moreis that we don't seem to have a framework to put in a regression test on the bug you just found (and thank you for
findingit so quickly!). 


--
-- Christophe Pettus  xof@thebuild.com




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Suggestion: Issue warning when calling SET TRANSACTION outside transaction block
Next
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: Data corruption issues using streaming replication on 9.0.14/9.2.5/9.3.1