Re: Data corruption issues using streaming replication on 9.0.14/9.2.5/9.3.1 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: Data corruption issues using streaming replication on 9.0.14/9.2.5/9.3.1
Date
Msg-id 20131119182931.GC7240@alap2.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Data corruption issues using streaming replication on 9.0.14/9.2.5/9.3.1  (Christophe Pettus <xof@thebuild.com>)
Responses Re: Data corruption issues using streaming replication on 9.0.14/9.2.5/9.3.1  (Christophe Pettus <xof@thebuild.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2013-11-19 10:27:30 -0800, Christophe Pettus wrote:
> 
> On Nov 19, 2013, at 10:25 AM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> > I am not sure how much code it's going to take (I'd hope somewhat less),
> > but it certainly will take some time to agree how it should be built and
> > then building and integrating it.
> 
> Given that the situation we're in right now is that we have an unknown
> number of silently corrupt secondaries out there which will only be
> discovered when someone promotes them to being a primary (possibly
> because the current primary died without a backup), I'd say that this
> is something pretty urgent.

It's pretty unlikely that any automated testing would have cought this,
the required conditions are too unlikely for that.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

-- Andres Freund                       http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Christophe Pettus
Date:
Subject: Re: Data corruption issues using streaming replication on 9.0.14/9.2.5/9.3.1
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Suggestion: Issue warning when calling SET TRANSACTION outside transaction block