On 11/10/20 3:31 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
>> On 11/9/20 5:41 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> What I have in mind to apply to 9.5 through 13 is per attached.
>> You also need to modify first_el_agg_any.
> ... doh. That one is a little messier because there's no equally useful
> substitute function. What I'm inclined to do for that is to add a
> SQL-language wrapper to reproduce the old signature for array_append.
> As attached. (I'm keeping this separate from the other patch, since
> this doesn't go back as far.)
>
>
Seems reasonable.
cheers
andrew
