Re: [HACKERS] RustgreSQL - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jim Nasby
Subject Re: [HACKERS] RustgreSQL
Date
Msg-id 9ef81dc2-0659-4a1b-3d74-f4797994e965@BlueTreble.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] RustgreSQL  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 1/9/17 3:15 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> The running unsafe PL in own managed processes is good idea - Years, I
> have a one diploma theme "better management of unsafe PL in Postgres" -
> but still without any interest from students :(.  I had two
> possibilities to see catastrophic errors related to wrong usage of
> PLPerlu. If we can locks interpret/environment in some safe sandbox,
> then it should be great.

Incidentally, Tom just observed in another thread that Tcl treats out of 
memory as a panic situation, so anyone using pltcl opens the risk of 
arbitrary database-wide panics. Fenced pltcl is one possible solution 
for that problem.
-- 
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
855-TREBLE2 (855-873-2532)



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jim Nasby
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] merging some features from plpgsql2 project
Next
From: Jim Nasby
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] RustgreSQL