On 15.08.24 02:43, Tom Lane wrote:
> I wrote:
>> Here's a rebased but otherwise identical patchset. I also added
>> an 0007 that removes check_rules.pl as threatened.
>
> I've done some more work on this and hope to post an updated patchset
> tomorrow. Before that though, is there any objection to going ahead
> with pushing the 0001 patch (pgindent'ing ecpg's lexer and parser
> files)? It's pretty bulky yet of no intellectual interest, so I'd
> like to stop carrying it forward.
The indentation patch looks good to me and it would be good to get it
out of the way.
