Re: Possible to store invalid SCRAM-SHA-256 Passwords - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

On 4/22/19 9:01 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:

>
> Also, the extra SELECT query with regexp_replace() is a bit overkill
> for the purpose, and copying again a copy of the regexp around is no
> fun.
>
> In short, I would simplify things as the attached.  What do you think?

Outside of the strlen comments, I do like the changes to the tests, +1

I did purposely keep the SCRAM + MD5 changes as separate patches as I
felt they were both atomic, but I have no strong opinions on that.

Thanks,

Jonathan