Re: [PATCH] Tracking statements entry timestamp in pg_stat_statements - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: [PATCH] Tracking statements entry timestamp in pg_stat_statements
Date
Msg-id 9ba4d9eb-1481-489c-a1ec-ce1893e8ec15@eisentraut.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] Tracking statements entry timestamp in pg_stat_statements  (Andrei Zubkov <zubkov@moonset.ru>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] Tracking statements entry timestamp in pg_stat_statements
List pgsql-hackers
On 24.10.23 09:58, Andrei Zubkov wrote:
> During last moving to the current commitfest this patch have lost its
> reviewers list. With respect to reviewers contribution in this patch, I
> think reviewers list should be fixed.

I don't think it's the purpose of the commitfest app to track how *has* 
reviewed a patch.  The purpose is to plan and allocate *current* work. 
If we keep a bunch of reviewers listed on a patch who are not actually 
reviewing the patch, then that effectively blocks new reviewers from 
signing up and the patch will not make progress.

Past reviewers should of course be listed in the commit message, the 
release notes, etc. as appropriate.




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)"
Date:
Subject: Open a streamed block for transactional messages during decoding
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: trying again to get incremental backup