Re: Global snapshots - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrey Lepikhov
Subject Re: Global snapshots
Date
Msg-id 9b36d84a-daac-be1a-df38-67a3317fc209@postgrespro.ru
Whole thread Raw
In response to RE: Global snapshots  ("tsunakawa.takay@fujitsu.com" <tsunakawa.takay@fujitsu.com>)
Responses RE: Global snapshots  ("tsunakawa.takay@fujitsu.com" <tsunakawa.takay@fujitsu.com>)
List pgsql-hackers

22.09.2020 03:47, tsunakawa.takay@fujitsu.com пишет:
> Does this make sense from your viewpoint, and can we think that we can use Clock-SI without infrindging on the
patent? According to the patent holder, the difference between Clock-SI and the patent seems to be fewer than the
similarities.
Thank you for this work!
As I can see, main development difficulties placed in other areas: CSN, 
resolver, global deadlocks, 2PC commit... I'm not lawyer too. But if we 
get remarks from the patent holders, we can rewrite our Clock-SI 
implementation.

-- 
regards,
Andrey Lepikhov
Postgres Professional



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Rowley
Date:
Subject: Re: Use appendStringInfoString and appendPQExpBufferStr where possible
Next
From: Daniel Gustafsson
Date:
Subject: Re: pgindent vs dtrace on macos