Re: BUG #16531: listen_addresses wide open? - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Bee.Lists
Subject Re: BUG #16531: listen_addresses wide open?
Date
Msg-id 9D56B90F-2A90-46C2-A7E2-4D66D9ED6CF5@gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: BUG #16531: listen_addresses wide open?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: BUG #16531: listen_addresses wide open?
List pgsql-bugs
> On Jul 8, 2020, at 6:35 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> You might have forgotten to restart (not just reload) the service after
> editing.  There'd have been a postmaster log message telling you that the
> new value wasn't applied yet, but you wouldn't know it if you didn't think
> to check the log file.

Over the last year I’ve restarted Postgres as well as the machine, both several times.

> Or you might've forgotten to uncomment that config file line, or edited
> the wrong copy of the config file (we've all been there).  Or there might
> have been another entry in the config file (or the pg.auto.conf file)
> overriding the one you changed.

I checked ‘show all;’ in psql after I edited it.  So the file was the correct one.

> And there's still the possibility of multiple postmasters on the machine.
> Or other mistakes I'm not thinking of at the moment.
>
> Checking the "show" result would have been a handy way to start narrowing
> down the possibilities.
>
> Anyway, while it remains possible that you saw a Postgres or kernel bug,
> I think pilot error is a far more likely explanation --- especially since
> I reproduced what you said you did on a similar platform (RHEL8) and did
> not see any such problem.
>
>> Well, all of a sudden, my app was complaining that Pogtgres wasn’t accepting on that port, when the app had been
usingjust that.  Nothing changed and it suddenly went deaf.  People suggested looking at the listen_addresses
directive.  
>
> Well, that does NOT square with how you've been describing the problem.
> You've been claiming that applications are successfully connecting when
> they shouldn't, which seems the exact opposite of this.

That above, is what got me investigating.  The recommendation lead me to that directive where the application should
haveNEVER had any authentication.   

> Also, it's difficult to make much headway with a report that "nothing
> changed" but things stopped working.  Evidently *something* changed.

I didn’t change anything.  I didn’t edit anything.  Nobody else has access to this server.  It stopped working, which
appearsthe way it should have behaved in the first place, according to the pg_hba.conf and postgresql.conf.  So I
thoughtI would inform the right people about a possible issue.   


Cheers, Bee







pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #16531: listen_addresses wide open?
Next
From: "David G. Johnston"
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #16531: listen_addresses wide open?