On Feb 18, 2007, at 23:12 , Karsten Hilbert wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 09:19:43PM +0900, Michael Glaesemann wrote:
>
>>> What I don't understand, however, is exactly *why* date_trunc is
>>> not immutable ?
>>
>> I believe it's because the result of date_trunc depends on the time
>> zone setting for the session.
>
> ...
>
>> So, given the same arguments, ('day', and current_timestamp),
>> date_trunc is returning two different results. (Casting to date has
>> the same issue.)
>
> Ah, I see. That makes sense.
>
> Now, if I'd write a
>
> date_trunc_utc(precision, timestamp with time zone)
>
> which converts input timestamps to UTC I could fairly safely
> mark that IMMUTABLE, no ?
Yeah, I think if you normalized it to UTC you could mark your new
function as immutable.
Michael Glaesemann
grzm seespotcode net
