> > PostgreSQL doesn't have an exact equivalent. Typically, the OLD and NEW values are compared and then action is
takenbased on that. For example, in PL/pgSQL:
> > IF NEW.is_canceled IS NOT DISTINCT FROM OLD.is_canceled THEN
> > NEW.is_canceled := etc etc ;
> > ENDIF;
> > There's currently no way to detect if the column was simply not mentioned at all in the UPDATE statement.
>
> That's not completely true: you can make the whole trigger firing
> dependent on that, by writing something like
>
> CREATE TRIGGER tgname BEFORE UPDATE OF column_name [, ... ] ON table ...
>
> and then the trigger won't fire if the column is not mentioned.
Well, this works if I've something like
IF UPDATING(...) THEN
But since I've
IF NOT UPDATING(...) THEN
This isn't working. Or am I missing something?
BR
Dirk
--
Dirk Mika
Software Developer
mika:timing GmbH
Strundepark - Kürtener Str. 11b
51465 Bergisch Gladbach
Germany
fon +49 2202 2401-1197
dirk.mika@mikatiming.de
www.mikatiming.de
AG Köln HRB 47509 * WEEE-Reg.-Nr. DE 90029884
Geschäftsführer: Harald Mika, Jörg Mika
