We need to keep the data as it is so remving data fold is not feasible.
If I run "pg_ctl promote" on the slave to make it fail over, this will break the replication and then clean up the
configurationrelated to replication. Any feedback?
Thanks,
Joanna
-----Original Message-----
From: Adrian Klaver [mailto:adrian.klaver@aklaver.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2016 7:50 PM
To: Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>; Joanna Xu <Joanna.Xu@amdocs.com>
Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Remove Standby (SLAVE) from Primary (MASTER) - Postgres9.1
On 10/26/2016 04:43 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 11:18 PM, Joanna Xu <Joanna.Xu@amdocs.com> wrote:
>> I’ve been looking for a procedure (step by step) on how to remove
>> Standby
>> (SLAVE) from Primary (MASTER) for Postgres9.1 in google and the
>> archived postings, but no luck.
>
> Standby and master servers are two separate Postgres instances. So if
> you would like to remove a standby from a cluster. You just need to
> basically stop it, then remove its data folder. And you are done.
> There is no complicated science here.
Not sure that is what OP wants. From the original post:
" ...
2. After the standby is removed from the primary, both of nodes
are in standalone configuration. "
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy
statement,
you may review at http://www.amdocs.com/email_disclaimer.asp
