>Right now, UNION DISTINCT, along with INTERSECT and EXCEPT, have basically no optimization support whatsoever...
> Sorry to be the bearer of bad news, but this isn't going to change just because you try to label it a bug.
Given the medium, I'll try not to read that in a snarky tone, after all, surely it's not unreasonable to label it a
defectfor a system not to optimize one of the basic relational primitives. That said, I know well the annoyance when a
usercries bug when the system is working as-designed. In any case, I'm at least glad to have resolution; I know that
thereis no choice but to work around it.
For a maximally general work-around given that the union is the essence of a reused view, perhaps a reasonable approach
isto switch to Union All and nest it within a Distinct outer query. That seems to produce workable plans in my tests
sofar. Maybe that could even form the basis of a planner enhancement that wouldn't require a complete refactor.
Thanks again,
-Nate
