> 2014-07-14 22:18 GMT+09:00 Kohei KaiGai <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>:
> > Hanada-san,
> >
> > Thanks for your checking. The attached v4 patch is rebased one on the
> > latest master branch. Indeed, merge conflict was trivial.
> >
> > Updates from the v3 are below:
> > - custom-plan.sgml was renamed to custom-plan-provider.sgml
> > - fix up the comments in pg_custom_plan_provider.h that mentioned
> > about old field name.
> > - applied your patch to fix up typos. (thanks so much!)
> > - put "costs off" on the EXPLAIN command in the regression test of
> > ctidscan extension.
>
> Checked, but the patch fails sanity-check test, you need to modify expected
> file of the test.
>
Sorry, expected result of sanity-check test was not updated on
renaming to pg_custom_plan_provider.
The attached patch fixed up this point.
> > Nothing to comment on the design and implementation from your
> > viewpoint any more?
>
> As much as I can tell, the design seems reasonable. After fix for the small
> issue above, I'll move the patch status to "Ready for committer".
>
--
NEC OSS Promotion Center / PG-Strom Project
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>
