Re: [Pgsqlrpms-hackers] Re: DBlink documentation - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [Pgsqlrpms-hackers] Re: DBlink documentation
Date
Msg-id 9980.1134852474@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [Pgsqlrpms-hackers] Re: DBlink documentation  (Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>)
Responses Re: [Pgsqlrpms-hackers] Re: DBlink documentation
Re: [Pgsqlrpms-hackers] Re: DBlink documentation
Re: [Pgsqlrpms-hackers] Re: DBlink documentation
List pgsql-general
Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> writes:
> I'm happy to lump all the docs back into the README if that's what you
> want, but I split it up in the first place because it was getting very long.

No, I'm not really proposing that we force all contrib modules to have
only a README.  I'm just annoyed by the lack of consistency (dblink/doc
versus tsearch2/docs, and some of the other modules seem to have some
doc files just loose in their top directory).

It's not only the downstream packagers that have missed these: the
Makefiles don't install them either.

It'd be a good idea to settle on what we want the installed file layout
to be --- do we need to create subdirectories under {prefix}/doc to
forestall name conflicts?

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Joe Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: [Pgsqlrpms-hackers] Re: DBlink documentation
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [Pgsqlrpms-hackers] Re: DBlink documentation