Re: Configure with thread sanitizer fails the thread test - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Configure with thread sanitizer fails the thread test
Date
Msg-id 997998.1627075117@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Configure with thread sanitizer fails the thread test  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> On 2021-07-23 13:42:41 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> TBH, I wonder why we don't just nuke thread_test.c altogether.

> +1. And before long it might be time to remove support for systems
> without threads...

I'm not prepared to go that far just yet; but certainly we can stop
expending configure cycles on the case.

Should we back-patch this, or just do it in HEAD?  Maybe HEAD+v14?

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Removing "long int"-related limit on hash table sizes
Next
From: Mark Dilger
Date:
Subject: Re: Delegating superuser tasks to new security roles (Was: Granting control of SUSET gucs to non-superusers)