On 4/9/21 12:09 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> One could make an argument, therefore, for holding off 0003 until
> there's more support for execution-time error cursors. I don't
> think we should though, for two reasons:
> 1. It'd be better to keep the pg_proc representation of new-style
> SQL functions stable across versions.
> 2. Storing the CREATE text means we'll capture comments associated
> with the function text, which is something that at least some
> people will complain about the loss of. Admittedly we have no way
> to re-integrate the comments into the de-parsed body, but some
> folks might be satisfied with grabbing the prosrc text.
>
+many for storing query text.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
