Re: Slow query - Mailing list pgsql-performance
From | Oleg Lebedev |
---|---|
Subject | Re: Slow query |
Date | |
Msg-id | 993DBE5B4D02194382EC8DF8554A5273113E5D@postoffice.waterford.org Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Slow query (Oleg Lebedev <oleg.lebedev@waterford.org>) |
List | pgsql-performance |
EXPLAIN ANALYZE plan is shown below. I also attached it as a file. One thing that might help is that the query produces 27 rows, which is much less than predicted 1963. QUERY PLAN Sort (cost=553657.66..553662.57 rows=1963 width=218) (actual time=133036.73..133036.75 rows=27 loops=1) Sort Key: medianame, status InitPlan -> Seq Scan on mediatype (cost=0.00..1.29 rows=1 width=8) (actual time=0.12..0.14 rows=1 loops=1) Filter: (medianame = 'Audio'::character varying) -> Index Scan using media_mtype_index on media m (cost=0.00..553550.28 rows=1963 width=218) (actual time=5153.36..133036.00 rows=27 loops=1) Index Cond: (mediatype = $0) Filter: (subplan) SubPlan -> Limit (cost=138.92..138.93 rows=1 width=24) (actual time=2.92..2.92 rows=0 loops=44876) -> Subquery Scan a1 (cost=138.92..138.93 rows=1 width=24) (actual time=2.92..2.92 rows=0 loops=44876) -> Unique (cost=138.92..138.93 rows=1 width=24) (actual time=2.91..2.91 rows=0 loops=44876) -> Sort (cost=138.92..138.93 rows=2 width=24) (actual time=2.91..2.91 rows=0 loops=44876) Sort Key: mediaid -> Append (cost=0.00..138.91 rows=2 width=24) (actual time=2.80..2.81 rows=0 loops=44876) -> Subquery Scan "*SELECT* 1" (cost=0.00..5.11 rows=1 width=8) (actual time=0.06..0.06 rows=0 loops=44876) -> Index Scan using media_pkey on media (cost=0.00..5.11 rows=1 width=8) (actual time=0.05..0.05 rows=0 loops=44876) Index Cond: (objectid = $1) Filter: (activity = 347667::bigint) -> Subquery Scan "*SELECT* 2" (cost=24.25..133.80 rows=1 width=24) (actual time=2.73..2.73 rows=0 loops=44876) -> Hash Join (cost=24.25..133.80 rows=1 width=24) (actual time=2.72..2.72 rows=0 loops=44876) Hash Cond: ("outer"."set" = "inner".objectid) -> Index Scan using intsetmedia_media_index on intsetmedia ism (cost=0.00..109.26 rows=38 width=16) (actual time=0.04..0.04 rows=1 loops=44876) Index Cond: (media = $1) -> Hash (cost=24.24..24.24 rows=6 width=8) (actual time=0.14..0.14 rows=0 loops=44876) -> Index Scan using set_act_index on "set" s (cost=0.00..24.24 rows=6 width=8) (actual time=0.11..0.13 rows=2 loops=44876) Index Cond: (activity = 347667::bigint) Total runtime: 133037.49 msec -----Original Message----- From: Stephan Szabo [mailto:sszabo@megazone23.bigpanda.com] Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 12:04 PM To: Oleg Lebedev Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Slow query On Mon, 24 Mar 2003, Oleg Lebedev wrote: > Please help me speed up the following query. It used to run in 2-5 > sec., but now it takes 2-3 mins! EXPLAIN ANALYZE output would be useful to see where the time is actually taking place (rather than an estimate thereof). ************************************* This email may contain privileged or confidential material intended for the named recipient only. If you are not the named recipient, delete this message and all attachments. Any review, copying, printing, disclosure or other use is prohibited. We reserve the right to monitor email sent through our network. *************************************
Attachment
pgsql-performance by date: