On 11/09/16 19:16, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
>
>
> On 11/09/16 17:01, Amit Kapila wrote:
>> ...Do you think we can do some read-only
>> workload benchmarking using this server? If yes, then probably you
>> can use concurrent hash index patch [1] and cache the metapage patch
>> [2] (I think Mithun needs to rebase his patch) to do so.
>>
>>
>>
>> [1] -
>> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAA4eK1J6b8O4PcEPqRxNYbLVbfToNMJEEm+qn0jZX31-obXrJw@mail.gmail.com
>> [2] -
>> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAD__OuhJ29CeBif_fLGe4t9Vj_-cFXBwCXhjO+D_16TXbemY+g@mail.gmail.com
>>
>>
>
> I can do - are we checking checking for hangs/assertions or comparing
> patched vs unpatched performance (for the metapage patch)?
>
>
So, assuming the latter - testing performance with and without the
metapage patch:
For my 1st runs:
- cpus 16, ran 16G
- size 100, clients 32
I'm seeing no difference in performance for read only (-S) pgbench
workload (with everybody using has indexes). I guess not that surprising
as the db fites in ram (1.6G and we have 16G). So I'll retry with a
bigger dataset (suspect size 2000 is needed).
regards
Mark
