Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0, Postgres vs. PostgreSQL - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Magnus Hagander
Subject Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0, Postgres vs. PostgreSQL
Date
Msg-id 9837222c1001231358u1c48d4d5s15afadc1c81367e1@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0, Postgres vs. PostgreSQL  ("David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
2010/1/23 David E. Wheeler <david@kineticode.com>:
> On Jan 23, 2010, at 1:22 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>
>> FYI, the figures for the past month are:
>> 1.    postgresql              45,579  10.91%
>> 2.    postgres                16,225  3.88%
>> 3.    postgre                 4,901   1.17%
>> 4.    postgresql download     4,590   1.10%
>> 5.    postgresql tutorial     2,408   0.58%
>> 6.    pg_dump                 1,755   0.42%
>> 7.    psql                    1,360   0.33%
>> 8.    postgresql odbc         1,022   0.24%
>> 9.    postgre sql             964     0.23%
>> 10.   pg_restore              871     0.21%
>
> Huh. No pgsql. Interesting.

pgsql shows up in position 31 with 0.12%.

Beaten even by "copy" with 0.15%.

Wel also have
17.    postgress    0.16%
30.    postgressql    0.12%
40.    postg        0.10%
70.    postgr        0.07%


-- Magnus HaganderMe: http://www.hagander.net/Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: commit fests
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: pgsql: In HS, Startup process sets SIGALRM when waiting for buffer pin.