Re: Setting oom_adj on linux? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Magnus Hagander
Subject Re: Setting oom_adj on linux?
Date
Msg-id 9837222c1001040859r5f0d8f5cv5f22ac85790a1c52@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Setting oom_adj on linux?  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: Setting oom_adj on linux?  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 17:55, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote:
> Magnus Hagander wrote:
>
>> Right. Which is why I like the idea of disabling the OOM killer for
>> the *postmaster*, but not the regular backends. Gives it a chance to
>> recover. It's not nice, but it's better than nothing.
>
> It doesn't sound like the init script can reenable the killer for the
> child processes though.  So, if there's anything that the core code
> ought to do, is re-enable OOM-killer for postmaster children, after
> being disabled by the initscript.

Yeah, that's why the backend code would need to be involved.


> BTW, is it possible for pg_ctl to disable OOM-killer?  I guess not,
> since it's not run by root ...

No, it has to run as root.


> Is there a way to disable memory overcommit for particular processes?
> That would be very useful -- just disable overcommit for all Postgres
> processes, and there shouldn't be much need to enable the killer for
> backends.

Not that I've been able to find.

-- Magnus HaganderMe: http://www.hagander.net/Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: New VACUUM FULL
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Setting oom_adj on linux?