ALTER TABLE INHERIT vs collations - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject ALTER TABLE INHERIT vs collations
Date
Msg-id 9826.1302992604@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: ALTER TABLE INHERIT vs collations  (Thom Brown <thom@linux.com>)
Re: ALTER TABLE INHERIT vs collations  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Re: ALTER TABLE INHERIT vs collations  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Right at the moment, ALTER INHERIT doesn't verify that collations match
in a proposed inheritance child.  So you can do this:

regression=# create table foo (f1 text collate "C");
CREATE TABLE
regression=# create table bar (f1 text collate "POSIX");
CREATE TABLE
regression=# alter table bar inherit foo;
ALTER TABLE

but then the planner whines about it:

regression=# select * from foo;
ERROR:  attribute "f1" of relation "bar" does not match parent's collation

Does anyone think it's not a bug that ALTER TABLE lets this through?
If so, what do you think the querying semantics ought to be?
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Marko Kreen
Date:
Subject: Re: MMAP Buffers
Next
From: Radosław Smogura
Date:
Subject: Re: MMAP Buffers