Bruce Momjian wrote:
[snip]
> What do people think of this patch? Is his way better, to always put
> the readers at the front if the current lock holder is a writer?
This way seems to make sense to me because it provides two guarantees:
1) Neither readers or writers can ever be starved when trying toa
access an object.
2) The system implements a FIFO queue. I.E. A reader can't "cut in
line" in front of a waiting writer just because the current access
mode is shared. The operations that have been waiting the longest get
serviced first.
Ocie Mitchell
