On Oct 27, 2011, at 9:18 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> So I'm going to go off and do that, but I wonder whether anyone thinks
> this is sufficiently important to back-patch. I'm inclined to think
> that back-patching isn't a good idea, because changing the
> representation of PLpgSQL_stmt_if will break (at least) EDB's plpgsql
> debugger; ISTM the number of complaints isn't enough to warrant doing
> that in released branches.
+1 to not back-patching. Seems like it doesn't come up all that often, right
Best,
David
