On 17/4/20 4:09 μ.μ., Adam Brusselback wrote:
Why not extract and store that metadata with the image rather than trying to extract it to filter on at query time? That way you can index your height and width columns to speed up that filtering if necessary.
Yes I thought of that, but those are coming automatically from our mail server (via synonym), we have written an alias : a program that parses and stores emails. This is generic, I wouldn't like to add specific code (or specific columns) just for image attachments. However I dig the idea of the indexes.
You may be able to write a wrapper for a command line tool like imagemagic or something so you can call that from a function to determine the size if you did want to stick with extracting that at query time.
As I describe above, those attachments are nowhere as files. They are email attachments. Also we got about half TB of them.
