Re: BUG #1947: Enhancement Request - CONCAT() function - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: BUG #1947: Enhancement Request - CONCAT() function
Date
Msg-id 967.1128807004@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to BUG #1947: Enhancement Request - CONCAT() function  ("Tony Marston" <tony@marston-home.demon.co.uk>)
Responses Re: BUG #1947: Enhancement Request - CONCAT() function
Re: BUG #1947: Enhancement Request - CONCAT() function
List pgsql-bugs
"Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby@pervasive.com> writes:
> And you might want to make it a project at http://pgfoundry.org so
> others can make use of it. You might also want to define it as accepting
> an array; I think that would allow you to accept any number of
> parameters.

I think Tony is trying to avoid putting in any actual work ;-).  To me,
the sanest change would be to modify his app to use the SQL-standard
syntax.  Which surely is supported by those other databases too, no?
And if not, why are *we* the ones getting the bug report?

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: David Fetter
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #1947: Enhancement Request - CONCAT() function
Next
From: "Jim C. Nasby"
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #1947: Enhancement Request - CONCAT() function